client
Chewing Gum
Our Role
We redefined fast-casual loyalty
Today’s Task
Event: Development and evaluation of two functional chewing gum flavor variants to assess their taste, texture, chewing characteristics, and formulation performance.
Today’s task focussed on systematically optimizing the formulation of two functional chewing gum variants by establishing suitable gum base, sweetener, flavor, and functional active ingredient levels. The trials were planned to refine chewability, flavor release, sweetness balance, and texture, followed by TPA and sensory assessment to identify formulation conditions that meet the targeted sensory, functional, and product-performance requirements.
Before starting, I anticipated technical challenges in balancing the gum base, sweetener, flavor system, and functional active ingredients without compromising chewability, texture, or flavor persistence. I planned to manage these challenges through controlled formulation trials, incremental ingredient adjustments, TPA-based texture assessment, and structured sensory evaluation to identify the most suitable formulation conditions for both variants. These are aligned as per the applicable FSSAI standards of the product.
Product Evaluation Plan
The Strawberry (V1) and Mint (V2) chewing gum formulations were developed and evaluated through controlled formulation, flavor, texture, and sensory testing to optimize their functional and sensory performance.
Observations & Learnings
Outcome (Analysis Table)
Interpretation
Texture Profile Analysis and sensory evaluation of the chewing gum variants showed V1 (Strawberry) with hardness of 82%, cohesiveness of 84%, springiness of 86%, and chewability of 85%, while V2 (Mint) recorded 88%, 87%, 90%, and 89%, respectively. Sensory evaluation recorded overall acceptability scores of 7.9/9 for V1 and 8.2/9 for V2, with V2 showing stronger flavor intensity, mouthfeel, and flavor persistence, while V1 achieved a slightly higher sweetness score of 7.6/9. Overall, V2 demonstrated stronger texture resilience, chewability, flavor persistence, and overall sensory performance, while V1 provided a slightly sweeter and balanced flavor profile.
We help you to comply with guidelines and attain certifications that you need.
Thank you for the Update and effortd caramel. We Appreciate the detailed trials and variations you've conducted. Please Ensure the flavor alignment is testes accordingly. I look forward to the final version and appreciate your continued dedication.
Very First thing, You all should feel proud yourself that you made something that do not exist in market. Heat and eat pasta with bold flavours.
V19 plain is the best anf finalized from our side. It is accurate in taste(plain), texture, and after tastte is also not bitter at all, He loved it as a plain flavour. V19 cardomon should add more flavour rest everything is fine.
Hello, I am using the oppurtunity to appreciate the teams effort we will be picking V1 for cola, So far we don't have any complain about it, I will like to know the type of sweetner use, during the taste test some said it too sweet while some said it for orange we are picking V2, no complain too, thank you once again
Since a year Ago, we statrted this journey of developing energy candy and we took different steps to develop the product. I am really happy to see endless efforts you people have done to develop an energy candy, Hats off to you and your didication towards unbiased work
Food Research Lab strives for excellence in new Food, Beverage and Nutraceutical Product Research and Development by offering cutting edge scientific analysis and expertise.