The degree to which dietary ingredients provide the desired therapeutic effects and/or health advantages is known as ingredient efficacy. Analyzing the efficacy of the ingredients is crucial since it guarantees that the active ingredients in the goods are scientifically proven to deliver the desired results. Clinical trials for foods are used to provide clinical evidence of the formulated items. To guarantee that the new food product is safe for human consumption, clinical evidence is required. For evaluating the clinical evidence of new products, a randomized controlled trial is regarded as the gold standard. Physical activity, sleep patterns, overall dietary habits, water intake, alcohol consumption, smoking, and other aspects must all be taken into account.
What is Ingredient efficacy and Clinical Evidence – For Health Claims
The degree to which dietary ingredients provide the desired therapeutic effects and/or health advantages is known as ingredient efficacy. Analyzing the efficacy of the ingredients is crucial since it guarantees that the active ingredients in the goods are scientifically proven to deliver the desired results. Clinical trials for foods are used to provide clinical evidence of the formulated items. To guarantee that the new food product is safe for human consumption, clinical evidence is required. For evaluating the clinical evidence of new products, a randomized controlled trial is regarded as the gold standard. Physical activity, sleep patterns, overall dietary habits, water intake, alcohol consumption, smoking, and other aspects must all be taken into account.
What is Ingredient Efficacy?
In the context of food and nutraceutical products, ingredient efficacy refers to the proven ability of a specific ingredient—or a combination of ingredients—to deliver measurable health benefits that go beyond basic nutrition. This includes therapeutic or preventive effects, such as supporting cardiovascular health, improving digestion, or enhancing immunity. Ingredient efficacy is not just a theoretical concept; it must be supported by robust scientific evidence that confirms the ingredient can deliver the claimed outcomes under intended conditions of use. Accurate ingredient analysis is therefore crucial, ensuring that the health claims made by manufacturers are backed by reproducible data and validated methods.
Why Is It Necessary to Undertake Ingredient Efficacy Studies?
Ingredient efficacy studies are fundamental to ensuring that food products and nutraceuticals deliver scientifically validated health benefits. These studies verify whether an ingredient (or combination of ingredients) provides tangible physiological effects beyond basic nutrition—such as lowering cholesterol, supporting immunity, or enhancing metabolic health. The cornerstone of such verification is the randomized controlled trial (RCT), widely considered the gold standard in clinical research. RCTs eliminate bias by randomly assigning participants to treatment or control groups, allowing researchers to isolate the effects of the ingredient or product being tested. However, RCTs alone cannot account for all influencing variables—such as diet, physical activity, sleep, and stress—which may confound outcomes. Furthermore, they require significant investment in time, funding, and expertise.
In this context, understanding ingredient efficacy is not just a scientific imperative—it is essential for developing safe, effective, and regulatory-compliant food products that promote health and well-being. It also forms the evidentiary foundation for substantiating health claims, as mandated by regulatory authorities such as FSSAI, FDA, and EFSA.
What Is Clinical Evidence?
Clinical evidence refers to data collected from human studies that evaluate the impact of a food product or ingredient on specific health outcomes. It supports the validity of health claims and is required by regulators to confirm both efficacy and safety of the marketed product.
What is the purpose of conducting clinical evidence and the process of obtaining it?
Purpose and Process of Clinical Evidence Generation
The goal of clinical evidence is to scientifically substantiate that the claimed health benefits of a food product or ingredient are real, measurable, and reproducible under typical use conditions. Here’s how the process generally unfolds:
- Well-Designed Trials
- Incorporate clearly defined protocols, control/placebo groups, and appropriate participant selection.
- Aim to reduce variability and bias to isolate the product’s effect.
- Controlled Environment
- Researchers maintain strict control over variables to ensure that any observed effects are attributable to the test ingredient or product.
- Use of RCTs
- Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups.
- Outcomes such as changes in blood pressure, lipid profiles, or inflammation markers are closely monitored.
- Specific, Measurable Outcomes
- Trials focus on targeted health indicators to evaluate efficacy (e.g., CRP levels, insulin sensitivity, gut microbiome diversity).
Types of Clinical Evidence
Clinical research in nutrition and functional foods generally falls into two main categories:
- Intervention Studies / Randomized clinical Trials
These studies aim to <establish causality by testing a food or ingredient in a controlled environment.
- Example: Evaluating whether beta-glucan-enriched oats reduce LDL cholesterol levels in adults with mild hyperlipidemia.
- Observational Studies
These studies assess correlations between dietary patterns and health outcomes in real-world settings.
- Example: A cohort study linking high omega-3 intake with reduced incidence of cardiovascular events over a 10-year period.
While observational studies cannot confirm causality, they offer valuable insights into long-term dietary behaviors and population-level effects.
Examples of Clinical Evidence in Food and Nutraceuticals
- Functional Foods: Trials assess how bioactive compounds affect health beyond caloric or nutrient value.
- Food Additives: Clinical studies evaluate the safety and metabolic effects of replacing sugar or fat with low-calorie substitutes.
- Health Claims: Human intervention trials are used to substantiate health claims on packaging and labeling.
- Food-Drug Interactions: Studies determine whether a functional ingredient interferes with medication efficacy or absorption.
- Food and Disease Prevention: Trials examine how specific foods may help manage or reduce the risk of chronic diseases (e.g., type 2 diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome).
Clinical Evidence Supporting Health Claims
Establishing health claims for food products or nutraceuticals requires compliance with specific regulatory standards. According to the FSSAI’s 2021 Compendium on Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, the following forms of evidence and principles are required to substantiate claims:
- Scientific Literature & Traditional Use Claims should be supported by documented evidence, including published scientific research, traditional texts, post-market surveillance, and population-based studies (e.g., epidemiological or cohort studies).
- Human Data and Validity Studies
Health-promoting claims must be based on valid human data demonstrating both efficacy and safety. This may include:
- Controlled clinical trials,
- Nutritional epidemiology studies,
- Concurrent and consensual validity studies.
- Qualified Health Claims Acceptable claims must relate to support of body functions (e.g., “supports immune function”) and be comprehensible to consumers. Claims should not imply treatment or cure of any disease.
- Language of Claims
- The word “shown” may be used when a single human study demonstrates benefit (e.g., “Product X is shown to support heart health”).
- The term “proven” can only be used if multiple human trials or strong epidemiological evidence specific to the Indian population exist.
- Restrictions on Disease Claims Functional foods must not imply drug-like efficacy, such as “prevents bone fragility in post-menopausal women,” or make curative disease claims through names, visuals (e.g., ECG symbols), or branding.
Obligations for Food Business Operators (FBOs)
To ensure compliance and scientific integrity, FBOs must:
- Maintain detailed product information and supporting scientific evidence,
- Have claims reviewed and endorsed by qualified experts or scientists,
- Notify the Food Authority of product-specific health claims before market entry,
- Modify or withdraw claims when directed by regulatory authorities based on expert review,
- Cooperate with FSSAI in case of technical queries or public complaints regarding health claims.
When Prior Approval is Needed
If a novel ingredient is introduced or if scientific support is insufficient, prior approval from the Food Authority is mandatory. This involves submission of comprehensive safety and efficacy data for regulatory evaluation.
Conclusion
Conducting ingredient efficacy studies and generating clinical evidence is not just a regulatory requirement—it is essential for building consumer trust, ensuring safety, and proving value. While randomized controlled trials remain the gold standard, a holistic approach—including observational research and traditional use data—is often necessary to fully understand and validate the health impacts of functional ingredients.
For manufacturers and brand owners, scientifically validated claims increase market credibility and regulatory compliance. For consumers, they ensure that the health promises made on labels are based on truth—not just marketing.
Let’s create something Innovative and Delicious together
Food Research Lab strives for excellence in new Food, Beverage and Nutraceutical Product Research and Development by offering cutting edge scientific analysis and expertise.
