Instant Noodles: Product Formulation and Shelf-Life Assessment

client

Instant Noodles

Our Role

We redefined fast-casual loyalty

Today’s Task

What We did Today?

Event: Formulation, Development, and Quality Characterization of Fried and Non-Fried Instant Noodles

Today’s task is focused on formulation of instant noodles, both fried and non-fried variants differentiating it from existing market products from USA. We selected all-purpose flour with moderate gluten-content as the primary base ingredient that provides structure, elasticity, and desirable chewiness. We carefully chosen starch and hydrocolloids to improve water absorption and cooking quality. Along with this, emulsifiers and antioxidants were also considered to maintain lipid stability and uniformity in fried noodles and stabilizers to provide consistent texture and prevent phase separation during storage. The study aimed to achieve balanced sensory and structural attributes while ensuring microbial safety and shelf stability .

How I Felt Before Starting – Formulating the Instant Noodles

Formulating instant noodles requires a careful optimization of gluten content without compromising the texture and elasticity. Furthermore, monitoring oil absorption rate in fried noodles and water activity in non-fried noodles possessed challenges in balancing the sensory attributes and shelf stability of the overall product. My prior knowledge and research in developing different kinds of instant noodles helped me to choose appropriate temperature for kneading, frying, and cooling. Additionally, I have developed a selecting and pre-preparing strategies for seasonings, preservatives, and stabilizers that enhance the final product quality.

Instant Noodles
Instant Noodles
Instant Noodles

🧪 What We Did Today?

Product Development Plan – Formulation of Instant Noodles

This task is carried out in the following phases:

  • Optimizing gluten development to achieve the desired textural properties and elasticity.
  • Optimal blend of ingredients, precise processing and storage conditions in maintaining product stability.
  • Shelf life testing by monitoring key indicators (moisture content, peroxide value, textural decay, and sensory attributes).

Two variants of noodle base have been formulated, characterised, and evaluated:

  • Variant 1 – Fried noodles: Oil-fried at 140–160 °C for 60–90 s
  • ariant 2 – Non-fried noodles: Hot-air dried at 70–80 °C for 30–45 min

Key Steps Followed Today:

  • All-purpose flour and other dry ingredients, including salt and supplementary flour, were sifted and combined in a mixing bowl.
  • The mixture was kneaded into a soft, cohesive dough using an adequate amount of water. Kneading was performed for 10–12 minutes to enhance gluten development, thereby improving elasticity and structural strength.
  • The dough was then allowed to rest for 30 minutes for gluten relaxation and uniform hydration.
  • The rested dough was assessed for cracks and smooth texture. Then, it was rolled into thin sheets of 1.2–1.5 mm thickness using a rolling pin.
  • The sheets were then cut into strands of 2–3 mm width to ensure uniformity and appealing noodle structure.

The noodle strands were steamed for 10 minutes to achieve partial gelatinization and ensure thorough pre-cooking. The steamed noodles were then cooled to ambient temperature.

The cooled noodles were subjected to dehydration to remove excess moisture.

  • Variant 1 (Fried): The strands were deep-fried in oil at 140–160°C for 60–90 seconds to obtain a crisp texture.
  • Variant 2 (Non-Fried): The strands were hot air-dried at 70–80°C for 30–45 minutes to produce a low-fat, shelf-stable product.
  • Post-dehydration, noodles were cooled for 5–10 minutes to remove residual heat and vapors. Prolonged exposure to air was avoided to prevent oxidative rancidity.
  • The noodles were immediately packed in airtight containers and stored below 25°C to maintain optimal flavor, texture, and nutrient retention.

📚 What I Learned?

Observations & Learnings

  • Non-fried noodles are more efficient regarding oxidative stability, lower fat content, and gluten strength, making them suitable for healthier and longer shelf-life products.
  • Fried noodles excel in sensory appeal and faster rehydration but carry higher oil content, lipid oxidation risks, and nutritional drawbacks.

Outcome

Nutritional Composition (per 100 g):

Parameter

Fried

Non-fried

Carbohydrate

60 g

60 g

Fat

20 g

10 g

Protein

8.5 g

10 g

 

Organoleptic evaluation

Quality

Variant 1

Variant 2

Appearance

7.4

7.3

Colour

7.5

7.3

Flavour

7.4

7.4

Taste

7.3

7.1

Texture

7.4

7.1

Mouthfeel

7.3

7.2

Overall Acceptability

7.5

7.2

Organoleptic evaluation of DEsi Noodle Flavors conducted at FRL sensory Lab

Out of most parameters assessed, the fried noodles stood out in taste and texture as it provides greater crispiness and color development than air-fried noodles.

The table below shows peroxide value and free fatty acid, oil absorbing index, dough rheology and total plate count for variant 1 and variant 2.

Physicochemical & Microbiological Parameters:

Property

Variant 1 (Fried)

Variant 2 (Non-Fried)

Peroxide value / FFA

Higher (oil frying)

Lower (air drying)

Oil absorption index

≈ 10 % retained oil

Negligible

Dough rheology

Weaker gluten due to frying

Stronger gluten

TPC (log CFU/g)

Low (frying acts as kill step)

Slightly higher

Shelf life: Fried ≈ 12–15 months; non-fried ≈ 15–18 months (<25 °C, <65 % RH).

 

What Went Well

  • Comprehensive evaluation parameters such as peroxide value, free fatty acids, TPC, oil absorption, dough rheology, and organoleptic tests provided a thorough quality profile.
  • Inclusion of gluten strength analysis through dough rheology connected processing to texture outcomes which is important for consumer acceptance.
  • Balanced sensory evaluation outcomes accounted for both health and flavor considerations, guiding product positioning effectively.

⚠️ What Could Be Improved

  • Incorporation of shelf-life studies over time to track changes in oxidation, microbial counts, and texture post-production.
  • Expand microbiological testing suite beyond TPC to include yeast, mold, and pathogen screening for food safety.
  • Exploration of ingredient fortification (fiber, protein, micronutrients) to enhance the nutritional value of both noodle variants.

What made to choose FRL

We help you to comply with guidelines and attain certifications that you need.

What made

Choose
FRL

caramel

Caramel

saudi

Thank you for the Update and effortd caramel. We Appreciate the detailed trials and variations you've conducted. Please Ensure the flavor alignment is testes accordingly. I look forward to the final version and appreciate your continued dedication.

Project Code:24FRL-BEV-NPD 4577-01
Name:Mohammad Hassan
pasta

Pasta

united kingdom

Very First thing, You all should feel proud yourself that you made something that do not exist in market. Heat and eat pasta with bold flavours.

Project Code:24-FRL-FOD-NPD-2462-02
Name:Miral
protein_biscuit

Protein Biscuits

India

V19 plain is the best anf finalized from our side. It is accurate in taste(plain), texture, and after tastte is also not bitter at all, He loved it as a plain flavour. V19 cardomon should add more flavour rest everything is fine.

Project Code: 24-FRL-FOD-NPD-3449-01
Name: Mehul Molir
cola

Cola

Nigeria

Hello, I am using the oppurtunity to appreciate the teams effort we will be picking V1 for cola, So far we don't have any complain about it, I will like to know the type of sweetner use, during the taste test some said it too sweet while some said it for orange we are picking V2, no complain too, thank you once again

Project Code: 24-FRL-BEV-REV-2878-01
Name: Esther
Energy Candy

Energy Candy

India

Since a year Ago, we statrted this journey of developing energy candy and we took different steps to develop the product. I am really happy to see endless efforts you people have done to develop an energy candy, Hats off to you and your didication towards unbiased work

Project Code: 24-FRL-NPD-FTP-PMR-2660-02
Name: Harshad